Wednesday, December 19, 2007

"Strategy that's making Iraq safer snubbed for years"

Iraqis gather around Sgt. Joseph Franklin to ask him about a clinic in Toma, a Baghdad neighborhood. An increased troop presence in the communities is part of a broader counterinsurgency strategy implemented this year.
By Jack Gruber, USA TODAY
Iraqis gather around Sgt. Joseph Franklin to ask him about a clinic in Toma, a Baghdad neighborhood. An increased troop presence in the communities is part of a broader counterinsurgency strategy implemented this year.
Iraqi soldiers display assorted arms, munitions and roadside bombs in an army camp in Diwaniyah, south of Baghdad. The weapons were confiscated during a three-week operation in the Shiite stronghold.
  Enlarge By Imad al-Khozai, Reuters
Iraqi soldiers display assorted arms, munitions and roadside bombs in an army camp in Diwaniyah, south of Baghdad. The weapons were confiscated during a three-week operation in the Shiite stronghold.

John McCain was right.  Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were wrong.

 
 
When Army Capt. Jeremy Gwinn's company patrolled Baghdad in 2005, the approach toward roadside bombs was simple: avoid them or die.

By early 2006, that strategy had begun to shift: Instead of hunting for the bombs, the soldiers hunted for bombmakers. "We started to know a lot of people in the community and develop contacts," recalls Gwinn, now a major. "There was a noticeable change … in the way we were doing things."

Today, that change has swept across Iraq, and attacks using improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, have declined steadily for eight months. Casualties from the bombs are at their lowest point since 2003, the first year of the war. Troops have seized twice as many weapons caches this year as they did all of last.

"Just about every single night, we are identifying and engaging one or more cells caught in the act of planting IEDs," Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. forces in Iraq, said in an interview.

Efforts to stop IEDs by targeting the insurgent networks that finance, build and plant the bombs showed results only after the Bush administration adopted a broader counterinsurgency strategy this year — and sent 30,000 more troops to Iraq to support it.
 
But a USA TODAY investigation shows that the strategy now used to defeat the bombmaking networks and stabilize Iraq was ignored or rejected for years by key decision-makers. As early as 2004, when roadside bombs already were killing scores of troops, a top military consultant invited to address two dozen generals offered a "strategic alternative" for beating the insurgency and IEDs.

That plan and others mirroring the counterinsurgency blueprint that the Pentagon now hails as a success were pitched repeatedly in memos and presentations during the following two years, at meetings that included then-Defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

The core of the strategy: Clear insurgents from key areas and provide security to win over Iraqis, who would respond by helping U.S. forces break IED networks and defeat the insurgency.

Bush administration officials, however, remained wedded to the idea that training the Iraqi army and leaving the country would suffice. Officials, including Cheney, insisted the insurgency was dying. Those pronouncements delayed the Pentagon from embracing new plans to stop IEDs and investing in better armored vehicles that allow troops to patrol more freely, documents and interviews show.

No comments :